> Should we hide the different handling by providing an x86 specific > version of the "bootm" command or should we add a new command that > deals with bzImage's special requirements? I'd use "mkimage" on the bzImage file to make an uImage, with name string, checksum and the rest of meta information (is load address applicable to the crappy 16-bit processor of the eighties?) /alessandro, who just learnt new grubs wait untile the vga cable is plugged _______________________________________________ u-boot-v2 mailing list u-boot-v2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/u-boot-v2
