On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 12:17:03PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > -config ARCH_AT91SAM9260 > > > - bool > > > - select ARM926EJS > > > - select ARCH_AT91 > > > +config ARCH_AT91RM9200 > > > + bool "Atmel AT91RM9200" > > > + select ARM920T > > > > > > -config ARCH_AT91SAM9263 > > > - bool > > > +config ARCH_MXC > > > + bool "Freescale MXC/iMX-based" > > > > Nah, please don't do this. I don't like the mxc in the Kernel, lets not > > introduce it here. It also has the real problem that it breaks the i.MX > > defconfigs. > so what will you prefer instead ARCH_IMX? Yes, ARCH_IMX is fine. It leaves the configs intact. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________ u-boot-v2 mailing list u-boot-v2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/u-boot-v2
