Re: KHTML security and web engine choices for TDE (Was: Re: I'M BAAAACK!)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wednesday 02 February 2022 09:55:35 pm William Morder via tde-users wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 February 2022 18:26:27 Michele Calgaro via tde-users wrote:
> > On 2022/02/03 03:17 AM, Hunter Ellett via tde-users wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 02 February 2022 09:53:10 am Mavridis Philippe wrote:
> > >> I'd argue that since it supports a very limited portion of JavaScript
> > >> and apparently none of the modern Web APIs like WebRTC, WebAssembly
> > >> etc., the attack surface is actually smaller. The only disadvantages
> > >> from a security standpoint would be effective lack of eyes and work on
> > >> the source (the obvious disadvantage being, of course, a browser stuck
> > >> in time).
> > >
> > > Agreed. I just disable Javascript and Java altogether. Perhaps until
> > > something can be done this should be the default.
> >
> > That may be a good idea I guess.
> >
> > >>   > Webkit
> > >
> > > With current manpower I don't see Konqueror getting a browser revival
> > > any time soon, but it's still nice to think about.
> >
> > Agreed, it is nice to discuss it and it would be good to do it. But not
> > sure of what effort is required and whether we can fit that in with
> > current manpower.
> > If anyone is willing to help, we can probably discuss it further.
> >
> > > Off-topic but blu, I don't know if I told you I liked Tristian (the
> > > polar bear). I never got to make my entry because then and now I've
> > > been too busy with the stress of modern academia to learn much outside
> > > of school. If we got another mascot, I would be fine with Tristian. :-)
> >
> > It was suggested to create a website page and ask around for people to
> > submit more choices. That is also a good idea, but we haven't done it
> > yet, it's one of the thousand's pending things....
> >
> > Cheers
> >    Michele
>
> I've said this before; some agree with me, and some don't, but here goes
> ...
>
> Konqueror is a great file manager, better than any of the other choices out
> there, in my opinion. But I think it's a very bad idea to use it as *both*
> a file manager *and* a web browser. That is an idea left over from the good
> old days, when most people didn't worry so much about having our machines
> compromised by intruders.
>
> If you use it for both file management and as a browser, it opens up a
> superhighway into your system. If you have ever somehow opened a browser
> window, and see a list of your home folder instead of a web page (for
> example), you may get what I mean. It's true, you can sandbox it, or you
> can block internet access for specific programs, but the best thing is just
> not to mix those two activities in such a program. Use it for one or the
> other.
>
> As I said, some may disagree, and maybe they do know better. As far as I am
> concerned, I would like to see a Konqueror stripped of all web browsing
> capabilities. As a file manager, however, I want development to continue,
> onward and upward, better and better, because I use it all the time, almost
> exclusively, as a file manager.
>
> Bill
> ____________________________________________________
Agreed.

Kate
____________________________________________________
tde-users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web mail archive available at https://mail.trinitydesktop.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Trinity Devel]     [KDE]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]     [Trinity Desktop Environment]

  Powered by Linux