Re: tork-trinity or tor fails to start privoxy? - P.S. what about heads?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 24 April 2021 07:33:12 pm William Morder via tde-users wrote:
> When I tried out Whonix before (about 2 or 3 years ago?), I used Qubes. It
> seemed too much trouble for what I want;

Aye!  Qubes is a way of life, and (while not having used it myself) does seem 
like it’d need a good 20 hours of up front time to get it to work.

> and besides, it seemed like I 
> couldn't use it for ordinary stuff like email, banking, buying stuff
> online ... where you generally need a direct connection.
> I don't know if 
> you get round that by changing your apparent location, etc., but that is an
> issue for me. I do sometimes have to connect to the outside world for
> business.
>

For doing stuff as ‘you’ (banking/email/whatnot) you’d install a VM (AppVM 1 
w/ Devuan etc. in that pic) that has direct network access.

https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Qubes

> And now, my biggest objection is that Whonix is Debian, thus systemd, and
> that violates a core tenet of my religion. A non-systemd version of Whonix,
> and I would definitely give it a try.

Yeah, I don't see that.  It'd basically whack fingerprint anonymity.

> I seem to recall yourself recommending a Raspberry Pi (or some such?) as a
> device to route all my traffic

Probably (if I did I’ve dropped the idea since).  I’ve been noodling on how to 
separate my business self from my personal self on the internet for ~20 
years(clients are completely arbitrary over what will trigger their 
bigotries).  A Pi or dedicated router to tor your whole network would work, 
but it’d be basically the same as using Whonix for everything (and a lot more 
work).

> ; I believe the question in that earlier 
> thread was how to send email over a proxy connection? something like that?

Not sure?  I send my email through a SSH tunnel direct into my mail server 
using raw IP addresses.  Makes it pretty hard for anyone to man in the middle 
me, plus you’re petty sure your mail isn’t read by your ISP.

> I suspect that my ISP may somehow be blocking the use of privoxy - by
> blocking port 8118, perhaps?

I’d guess that’s not accurate?  I skimmed Privoxy’s FAQ, and it just looks 
like it’s a local service on your own machine filtering/intercepting your own 
box’s traffic and then forwarding the traffic on to your regular ISP 
modem/router.  Port 8118 is used on your box only, so this sounds more like a 
Privoxy config issue (maybe you’ve got a wrong value somewhere?  hostname? 
toggle?).

https://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/config.html

> The reason I don't quite trust my ISP is that they have recently created a
> Tor exit node for themselves. Even if I trusted that they were kindly
> trying to protect their users, it seems inherently insecure to use a Tor
> exit node that is run by my ISP, so I have blocked their Tor server. And
> now I cannot get privoxy to start up, no matter how I've gone about it.

Okay, your ISP setting up a tor exit node (should!) have zero to do with any 
of their customer’s connections (to tor or otherwise).  The tor software on 
your computer picks a random entry node (first hop).  I do agree though with 
blocking the first hop connecting to your own ISP’s tor node, and blocking 
its use as an exit node probably makes good sense too, so yeah, just block 
its use completely...  It’s been a long time since I dug through tor’s config 
options, but there was a way to block the first hop from using a country 
(e.g. if you’re in the USA, block all ECHELON countries from being the first 
hop).

At the point you’re at, I’d try getting Privoxy to work without adding any of 
the tor layers and turning off all of its [actions?] (I’m guessing at that, 
whatever ‘stuff’ it’s filtering so to speak).

> No paranoia here! Just good wholesome fun. Clean living and clean thoughts:
> there's the key!

It’s all fun and games until those guys in black suits and mirrored sunglasses 
knock on your door.  ;)  Seriously though, like you I’ve got zip all to hide, 
it’s just the level of ‘big brother’ watching everything is revolting, so 
doing ‘my part’ to mitigate some of it seems reasonable.

Case in point.

A month or so back, me and the misses saw a chain store we hadn’t been in, in 
20 odd years, so for nostalgia we wandered in, browsed around and left 
without buying anything.  Approximately six days later she started getting 
ads for that store on her Facebook page.  My best guess (since she uses 
gmail, uhg!) is the big G tracked her phone going into the store, shared/sold 
the data to FB, and ‘targeted’ ads for her...  So f-ing creepy...

laters,
Michael
____________________________________________________
tde-users mailing list -- users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web mail archive available at https://mail.trinitydesktop.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Trinity Devel]     [KDE]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]     [Trinity Desktop Environment]

  Powered by Linux