Re: New Motherboard Opinions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 25 August 2020, E. Liddell wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:54:13 -0400
>
> "BorgLabs - Kate Draven" <borglabs4@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hello Collective
> >
> > As I said previously, I'm rebuilding my primary computer.
> > I've contacted several board makers and only gigabyte replied so far.
> > Below is their offerings for threadripper cpus. I'd like opinions and
> > why.
> >
> > https://www.gigabyte.com/us/Motherboard/AMD-TRX40
> >
> > Thanks to all in advance,
>
> I have a Threadripper 1900X (that's the early, low-end 8-core/16-thread
> offering that they dropped for later generations) and an ASUS Prime X399-A
> motherboard. That's a TR4 socket board, so if you're buying a 3rd
> generation Threadripper, you don't want that exact board—you'll need a TRX4
> socket instead.  I've never worked with Gigabyte boards specifically, so I
> can't comment on their build quality.  ASUS sometimes has better reviews,
> but the difference seems small.
>
> Even low-end Threadripper boards should be fairly well tricked out (in both
> useful and non-useful ways—I didn't really *want* those RGB LEDs . . .). 
> The first thing I would consider is how many M.2/NVMe and SATA slots you
> need, and how many PCIe add-on board slots, because there's sometimes a
> tradeoff there.  I notice that Gigabyte's site doesn't tell you how many
> plain SATA drives the boards accommodate (newegg gives 8xSATA for the
> Gigabyte Aorus Master).
>
> The second thing I'd look at is how many of which kind of onboard USB
> headers the board has (2.0 VS 3 VS 3 with USB-C), and how many you need,
> keeping in mind that each header may support multiple ports.
>
> The Gigabyte boards have built in WLAN—is this a feature you want? 
> Otherwise they seem superficially similar to my non-WLAN ASUS board, with
> Realtek hi-def audio and Intel LAN chipsets . . . but there's one more
> thing you need to be careful of. While I'm not sure it's still true in this
> generation, many early Threadripper boards like mine use specific variants
> of the it87 sensor chip that are only supported under Linux by an
> unmaintained out-of-tree kernel driver that has to be specially loaded to
> suppress an ACPI conflict.  Without a working driver for that chip, you
> can't get fan information. It's possible that doesn't matter to you, of
> course.
>
> Overall, my Threadripper's always run cool (~30C is typical, ~60C if I'm
> compiling OpenOffice or something, and I've never seen it break 70C). 
> That's in a large, moderately well-ventilated case with an unexceptional
> CPU fan.
>
> Hope that helps in some way.
>
> E. Liddell
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Liddell, adding to the database.

Kate

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/
Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting





[Index of Archives]     [Trinity Devel]     [KDE]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]     [Trinity Desktop Environment]

  Powered by Linux