David C. Rankin wrote: > There is just no comparison. The whole crux of the issue behind VirtualBox > was to wrap qemu in a sane gui that most people could configure without > more than reading a howto. I've tried them all and usually have 6-10 guest > running headless on multiple servers. By my comparison, it is the way to > go. > +1 I did not try them all but also run what I need headless > I did use virt-manager (just to do it) and had no issue getting a working > Arch guest going on an Arch host, but it just hasn't had the amount of > development that Oracle put into vbox. Try them all, but I suspect I know > where you will end up.... With the virtualbox-oracle-extensions providing > USB to your guests, it is hard to beat... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
