Anno domini 2019 Thu, 5 Sep 01:08:44 -0500 David C. Rankin scripsit: > On 09/03/2019 01:51 PM, Michael wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > What’s everyones favorite front end for KVM? I’m looking to use KVM for > > several VMs (Win, CentOS6, CentOS7) and was looking for something a bit > > easier to start out on than raw virt-manager. > > > > Unless you just want to learn raw qemu or use virt-manager (workable, but a > bit awkward), then VirtualBox is the key. It uses qemu (and can use several > other backends) It can generate the raw qemu commands if you like. > > There is just no comparison. The whole crux of the issue behind VirtualBox was > to wrap qemu in a sane gui that most people could configure without more than > reading a howto. I've tried them all and usually have 6-10 guest running > headless on multiple servers. By my comparison, it is the way to go. > > I did use virt-manager (just to do it) and had no issue getting a working Arch > guest going on an Arch host, but it just hasn't had the amount of development > that Oracle put into vbox. Try them all, but I suspect I know where you will > end up.... With the virtualbox-oracle-extensions providing USB to your guests, > it is hard to beat... > VirtualBox is not available for beowulf/buster - that's why I have to use virt-manager :( BTW, do you know how to set the screen resolution to 1024x768 in virt-manager? Nik -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: trinity-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: trinity-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Read list messages on the web archive: http://trinity-users.pearsoncomputing.net/ Please remember not to top-post: http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/mailing_lists/#top-posting
