Re: Unmet build dependencies: ninja-build

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Slávek Banko via tde-devels wrote:

> When building using classic make, there was more advantageous when the
> builds of individual languages were individual builds because overhead
> depending on the number of targets was smaller. A large number of targets
> for classic make is just not manageable. Ninja build is definitely more
> advantageous.
> 

I agree - additional and major gain - for me was the purchasing of SDDs :)

BTW you could perhaps help us with overwriting target :) when we are in the
discussion anyway :)
https://mirror.git.trinitydesktop.org/gitea/deloptes/tdebluez/pulls/1

thank you, Slavek
____________________________________________________
tde-devels mailing list -- devels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devels-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web mail archive available at https://mail.trinitydesktop.org/mailman3/hyperkitty/list/devels@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Trinity Users]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [KDE]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]     [Trinity Desktop Environment]

  Powered by Linux