On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 11:59 +0100, David Disseldorp wrote: > Aha - If I run the test against a fileio backed LU then it passes, it > fails against either of the iblock backed LUs. Perhaps this race is > dependent on the I/O making it to the backstore/block layer by the time > the LU RESET request comes in? In the past I hit a bug similar to this > (in the ABORT TASK path), and used the dm-delay device (setup by the > script) to trip the race. > > Do you see the failure when testing against LUN1 or LUN2? That's a good catch. I have integrated a fix in my scsi-target-for-v4.11 branch on kernel.org. Would it be possible to repeat your test against that code base (commit acb1c8eca422)? Thanks, Bart.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
