On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 01:03 +0200, Sebastian Herbszt wrote: > Hello Alex, > > Alex Leung wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > On Sunday, August 10, 2014 3:57 PM, Sebastian Herbszt wrote: <SNIP> > > > > You're correct on both. However, this will change to an MIT like > > > > license in our next release (though still not GPL). Does that change > > > > anything for you? > > > > > > do you know whether this MIT like license will be GPL compatible? > > > > TBD. It's an outstanding question that we are discussing at this point. > > GPL compatible is a must then for you? > > I think legal "uncertainties" could be avoided if the driver would be GPL > compatible (Dual MIT/GPL). It should allow upstream inclusion and Linux > distributions could pick it up. The driver would no longer taint the kernel > or invalidate support contracts. > AFAIK, there are no plans by Emulex to push their target driver upstream. --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
