Re: Lower than expected iSCSI performance compared to CIFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nicholas,

>
> It's my understanding that Synology is caching all of their writes to
> the backend, which explains the difference between different MD raid
> backends.
>

I'll see if I can confirm that.  It certainly would explain the performance.

>
> dd is a pretty crummy test.  I'd recommend using fio instead.
>

I'll give fio a shot, then.

Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux