Re: Lower than expected iSCSI performance compared to CIFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jörn,

>
> To me this indicates a latency issue.  If you can measure the average
> latency from windows or any other initiator, you could quickly
> confirm.  And the likely cause is the usual: cheating.  Caching all
> data in memory will turn the problem from latency-limited to
> bandwidth-limited - at the cost of the odd data corruption if you
> happen to crash or get a power failure.
>

Given the fact the same initiator client talking to a different NAS
(from Synology) is performing considerably faster, I think that would
suggest the source of the latency is on the Linux system which I am
using for my iSCSI target.  I also assume, because Samba does so well,
that the issue would be on the disk side of the iSCSI.  Would you
concur?

Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux