Re: FCoE Target naming - help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 21:09 +0200, Tomas Molota wrote:
> Sorry, wrong kernel. I booted with correct one. 
> root@test:~# sg_inq -H /dev/sdb
> standard INQUIRY:
>  00     00 00 05 02 1f b0 00 02  4c 49 4f 2d 4f 52 47 20    ........LIO-ORG 
>  10     49 42 4c 4f 43 4b 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    IBLOCK..........
>  20     34 2e 30 00                                         4.0.
> So difference is after ORG is 20, but after IBLOCK still 00
> 

Hi Tomas,

I still don't think that your using the correct version of the patch.
(Eg: you applied v1, but not the updated v2 below).

Again, please confirm that your using the v2 below that uses memcpy() +
strlen() for the inquiry MODEL.

Thanks,

--nab

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
index 4cb667d..9fabbf7 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
@@ -97,9 +97,12 @@ spc_emulate_inquiry_std(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *buf)
 
        buf[7] = 0x2; /* CmdQue=1 */
 
-       snprintf(&buf[8], 8, "LIO-ORG");
-       snprintf(&buf[16], 16, "%s", dev->t10_wwn.model);
-       snprintf(&buf[32], 4, "%s", dev->t10_wwn.revision);
+       memcpy(&buf[8], "LIO-ORG ", 8);
+       memset(&buf[16], 0x20, 16);
+       memcpy(&buf[16], dev->t10_wwn.model,
+              min_t(size_t, strlen(dev->t10_wwn.model), 16));
+       memcpy(&buf[32], dev->t10_wwn.revision,
+              min_t(size_t, strlen(dev->t10_wwn.revision), 4));
        buf[4] = 31; /* Set additional length to 31 */
 
        return 0;




> S pozdravom / Best regards
>  
> Tomas Molota
> Chief Technology Officer
> 
> 
> Parickova 18, 821 08 Bratislava, Slovakia
> e-mail: tomas.molota@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> web: www.lightstorm.sk
> phone: +421 2 32 400 011
> cell phone: +421 903 788 100
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas A. Bellinger [mailto:nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 8:38 PM
> To: Tomas Molota
> Cc: 'Roland Dreier'; 'target-devel'
> Subject: Re: FCoE Target naming - help
> 
> On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 09:19 +0200, Tomas Molota wrote:
> > Ok Nicholas i finaly have it and it looks like this:
> > root@test:~# sg_inq -H /dev/sdb
> > standard INQUIRY:
> >  00     00 00 05 02 1f b0 00 02  4c 49 4f 2d 4f 52 47 00    ........LIO-ORG.
> >  10     49 42 4c 4f 43 4b 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    IBLOCK..........
> >  20     34 2e 30 00                                         4.0.
> > 
> > There are 00 chars instead of 20
> 
> Thanks, so this confirms that the previous patch has not been properly applied and/or updated kernel rebuilt + installed on your target side setup.
> 
> Please double check that the same patch (included below) and updated target_core_mod.ko are being correctly installed.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> --nab
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
> index 4cb667d..9fabbf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_spc.c
> @@ -97,9 +97,12 @@ spc_emulate_inquiry_std(struct se_cmd *cmd, unsigned char *buf)
>  
>         buf[7] = 0x2; /* CmdQue=1 */
>  
> -       snprintf(&buf[8], 8, "LIO-ORG");
> -       snprintf(&buf[16], 16, "%s", dev->t10_wwn.model);
> -       snprintf(&buf[32], 4, "%s", dev->t10_wwn.revision);
> +       memcpy(&buf[8], "LIO-ORG ", 8);
> +       memset(&buf[16], 0x20, 16);
> +       memcpy(&buf[16], dev->t10_wwn.model,
> +              min_t(size_t, strlen(dev->t10_wwn.model), 16));
> +       memcpy(&buf[32], dev->t10_wwn.revision,
> +              min_t(size_t, strlen(dev->t10_wwn.revision), 4));
>         buf[4] = 31; /* Set additional length to 31 */
>  
>         return 0;
> root@haakon3:/usr/src/target-pending.git# 
> 
> 
> > 
> > standard INQUIRY:
> >  00     00 00 04 32 5b 18 00 02  46 41 4c 43 4f 4e 20 20    ...2[...FALCON  
> >  10     49 50 53 54 4f 52 20 44  49 53 4b 20 20 20 20 20    IPSTOR DISK     
> >  20     76 31 2e 30 44 45 59 51  49 31 51 33 57 37 33 58    v1.0DEYQI1Q3W73X
> >  30     20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20  00 00 00 40 09 60 02 60            ...@.`.`
> >  40     03 20 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    . ..............
> >  50     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00    ................
> > 
> > host7 LUNs:
> > Path       Device     Size   Vendor          Model                State   
> > 7:0:0:0    sdb       53 GB   LIO-ORG         IBLOCK               running 
> > 7:0:0:1    sdc      107 GB   LIO-ORG         IBLOCK               running 
> > 7:0:0:2    sdd      161 GB   LIO-ORG         IBLOCK               running 
> > 7:0:7:0    sde      429 GB   FALCON          IPSTOR DISK          running 
> > 7:0:8:0    sdf      429 GB   FALCON          IPSTOR DISK          running
> > 
> > 
> > S pozdravom / Best regards
> >  
> > Tomas Molota
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > 
> > 
> > Parickova 18, 821 08 Bratislava, Slovakia
> > e-mail: tomas.molota@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > web: www.lightstorm.sk
> > phone: +421 2 32 400 011
> > cell phone: +421 903 788 100
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nicholas A. Bellinger [mailto:nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 12:00 AM
> > To: Tomas Molota
> > Cc: 'Roland Dreier'; 'target-devel'
> > Subject: Re: FCoE Target naming - help
> > 
> > On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 22:43 +0200, Tomas Molota wrote:
> > > Here is tshark dump from target server. I dont see there inquiry string.
> > > 
> > 
> > Mmmm, strange the capture only contains the incoming (and not outgoing) FCP packets to the FCoE target..
> > 
> > Would it be possible to just hookup a normal Linux FCoE initiator in order to verify sg_inq -H output..?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > --nab
> > 
> > > S pozdravom / Best regards
> > >  
> > > Tomas Molota
> > > Chief Technology Officer
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Parickova 18, 821 08 Bratislava, Slovakia
> > > e-mail: tomas.molota@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > web: www.lightstorm.sk
> > > phone: +421 2 32 400 011
> > > cell phone: +421 903 788 100
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nicholas A. Bellinger [mailto:nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:41 PM
> > > To: Tomas Molota
> > > Cc: 'Roland Dreier'; 'target-devel'
> > > Subject: Re: FCoE Target naming - help
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 21:03 +0200, Tomas Molota wrote:
> > > > Nope, its not in /dev/ in any way, only where i found something 
> > > > about it is in 
> > > > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:04:00.0/host100/rport-100:0-4/ etc..
> > > 
> > > Mmmm..
> > > 
> > > > Problem is that wireshark will not help in this combination, 
> > > > becouse linux is FCoE target, but FalconStor is pure FC initiator 
> > > > with modified qla2x00 driver.
> > > 
> > > Why is it not possible to capture ethernet packets from the FCoE target using wireshark..?  
> > > 
> > > http://wiki.wireshark.org/FCoE
> > > 
> > > --nab
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe target-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SCSI]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Linux IIO]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux