On Do, 18.01.24 23:40, Nils Kattenbeck (nilskemail@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > They are turning up as failed units, so they are being run, > > > even if I don't have any TPM module. Also, I have a notifier in > > > my waybar telling me of failed services and I don't want to see > > > them there. > > > > Can you provide logs about this? The goal is definitely to make these > > NOPs on TPM-less systems. I am a bit puzzled that the conditioning > > they come with is not sufficient. We might need to tweak something > > there then. > > > > The idea is that the system does TPM setup on systems that have a tpm > > and on systems lacking that silently just skips all these so that > > everything always works fully automatically and robustly without any > > ugly error output. > > > > hence, any chance you can provide logs about this? and what kind of > > system is this? i.e. does it really lack a tpm? > > In the past I have seen errors on systems which do not have > libtss2/tpm2-tss installed though I am not sure if those should be > silenced. After all, the unit being enabled means that one wants to > use it if possible - and if the libraries are missing that should be > noticeable to the user instead of a silent fail. No, the libs are installed, that's what the "systemd-creds has-tpm2" output shows. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin