On Do, 18.01.24 19:43, Morten Bo Johansen (mortenbo@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On 2024-01-18 Andy Pieters wrote: > > > Not being funny, but why care? They have got a conditional check in them > > and will only run when it makes sense. > > So these units will do nothing and won't delay your boot or take up > > resources > > They are turning up as failed units, so they are being run, > even if I don't have any TPM module. Also, I have a notifier in > my waybar telling me of failed services and I don't want to see > them there. Can you provide logs about this? The goal is definitely to make these NOPs on TPM-less systems. I am a bit puzzled that the conditioning they come with is not sufficient. We might need to tweak something there then. The idea is that the system does TPM setup on systems that have a tpm and on systems lacking that silently just skips all these so that everything always works fully automatically and robustly without any ugly error output. hence, any chance you can provide logs about this? and what kind of system is this? i.e. does it really lack a tpm? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin