Antw: [EXT] Re: "Correct" way to obtain DHCP lease info?

["Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> "Bruce A. Johnson" <bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 22.04.2021
um
22:14 in Nachricht
<5aaf83b2-9857-425d-2d7f-b9660abf9209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I'm still trying to get an explanation of why having a valid DHCP 
> address is not in itself good enough. The only reason I've been able to 
> see is that after the lease is issued, and before the time comes to 
> refresh the lease, there could be a communication failure somewhere 
> between the switch the DHCP client is on and the home office where the 
> DHCP server is. One would assume that application failures would be a 
> reasonable clue.... Regardless, it seems to me that it's not 
> unreasonable for an application outside of systemd-networkd to be able 
> to obtain the DHCP lease information. Am I off base here?

Hi!

I did not follow the discussion closely, but using USB tehering with my
smartphone typically results in DHCP leases of one hour.
I had made the experience that network stopped many times after about one hour
(when the DHCP lease should have been refreshed, but wasn't).
I ran "watch ip r sh" in a terminal to monitor: Once the "usb0" interface was
gone, I knew there is a problem. Restarting the tethering fixed the problem in
practically all cases.
So long story short: I think there is a valid reason to be able to debug DHCP
and fellows...

Regars,
Ulrich


> 
> Bruce A. Johnson | Firmware Engineer
> Blue Ridge Networks, Inc.
> 14120 Parke Long Court Suite 103 | Chantilly, VA 20151
> Main: 1.800.722.1168 | Direct: 703-633-7332
> http://www.blueridgenetworks.com 
> OpenPGP key ID: 296D1CD6F2B84CAB https://keys.openpgp.org/ 
> 
> On 22/04/2021 12:00, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 6:17 PM Bruce A. Johnson 
>> <bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>> <mailto:bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>     Silvio, thanks for the suggestion. I'm not concerned with keeping
>>     the lease forever; the system actually experiences a topology
>>     change as it's switched from one network to another, and I can
>>     catch that from the DBus events that occur. The problem we're
>>     trying to solve is to contact some address that we're sure exists
>>     on the network, without knowing anything about that network. The
>>     default gateway was an obvious choice, but someone wants to cover
>>     the case of there being a private LAN with no gateway. The only
>>     other choice I could see is the DHCP server that issues the lease.
>>
>> Hmm, don't you also have the case of there being a private LAN with no 
>> gateway and no DHCP? Or possibly the case of a DHCP relay. And since 
>> you don't know anything about the network, you also don't know whether 
>> the address will respond to your communication attempts (other than 
>> ARP) -- it might be pingable but it might be not.
>>
>> I'm curious about what brought this problem into existence in the 
>> first place. Why *is* it necessary to contact a random address within 
>> the network? (If it's to check that the physical interface is working, 
>> then just the fact that you somehow acquired a lease would be enough. no?)
>>
>> -- 
>> Mantas Mikulėnas



_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel