>>> Simon McVittie <smcv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb am 18.06.2020 um 16:42 in Nachricht <27143_1592491364_5EEB7D64_27143_46_1_20200618144233.GA644073@horizon>: > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 11:01:59 +0200, Jérémy ROSEN wrote: >> multiple unit files need to work together to make a working environment, and >> systemd can't know when all changes are consistent and >> it is safe to reload. So systemd will want an explicit order from the user. > > Also, reloading is disruptive and can be "expensive" in terms of resource > use. If you're making a lot of changes (like an upgrade transaction in > a package manager like apt or RPM), you probably want to do the entire > transaction, and then reload *once*. > > dbus‑daemon *does* automatically reload when configuration or service files > change. People now expect/rely on this, so it's undesirable to change, > but with hindsight I wish it didn't. I think the fact that systemd *doesn't* > automatically reload is partly learning from dbus‑daemon's mistake. > > On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 12:43:59 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> Is there something like "systemd suggests daemon‑reload" (assuming systemd >> detects the situation, but does not issue a reload itself)? > > Yes there is: > > $ systemctl status dbus.service > (... some information here ...) > $ sudo touch /lib/systemd/system/dbus.service > $ systemctl status dbus.service > Warning: The unit file, source configuration file or drop‑ins of > dbus.service changed on disk. Run 'systemctl daemon‑reload' to reload > units. > (... same status information ...) > > In this case I didn't really alter /lib/systemd/system/dbus.service, > just changed its mtime, but you'd get the same thing from an edit that > actually matters. Yes, I've seen such message before, but I had been thinking of something like a distinct exit status, or a specific query command. > > smcv _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel