On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 11:01:59 +0200, Jérémy ROSEN wrote: > multiple unit files need to work together to make a working environment, and > systemd can't know when all changes are consistent and > it is safe to reload. So systemd will want an explicit order from the user. Also, reloading is disruptive and can be "expensive" in terms of resource use. If you're making a lot of changes (like an upgrade transaction in a package manager like apt or RPM), you probably want to do the entire transaction, and then reload *once*. dbus-daemon *does* automatically reload when configuration or service files change. People now expect/rely on this, so it's undesirable to change, but with hindsight I wish it didn't. I think the fact that systemd *doesn't* automatically reload is partly learning from dbus-daemon's mistake. On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 at 12:43:59 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > Is there something like "systemd suggests daemon-reload" (assuming systemd > detects the situation, but does not issue a reload itself)? Yes there is: $ systemctl status dbus.service (... some information here ...) $ sudo touch /lib/systemd/system/dbus.service $ systemctl status dbus.service Warning: The unit file, source configuration file or drop-ins of dbus.service changed on disk. Run 'systemctl daemon-reload' to reload units. (... same status information ...) In this case I didn't really alter /lib/systemd/system/dbus.service, just changed its mtime, but you'd get the same thing from an edit that actually matters. smcv _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel