>>> Jérémy ROSEN <jeremy.rosen@xxxxxxxx> schrieb am 18.06.2020 um 11:01 in Nachricht <19710_1592470931_5EEB2D93_19710_59_1_CAFvCimXJwvDg0+5W11H0pUh+EHDTGxgbAuAGpG2PL gjC0iX7A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Le jeu. 18 juin 2020 à 08:53, Ulrich Windl < > Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > >> Hi! >> >> I have a question: systemd monitors almost everything it seems to me. So I >> wonder: >> Under what conditions is it necessary to issue a daemon-reload, and why >> can't systemd find out itself that a daemon-reload is required? >> > > There are some cases where systemd can detect the proper time for a > daemon-reload, and does it implicitely > systemd also check mtime of configuration files so it can see when a > daemon-reload should be done. Is there something like "systemd suggests daemon-reload" (assuming systemd detects the situation, but does not issue a reload itself)? > > However it is not because a file has been modified that systemd should > decide to reload by itself. > multiple unit files need to work together to make a working environment, > and systemd can't know when all changes are consistent and > it is safe to reload. So systemd will want an explicit order from the user. I see (see above). > > So if I think a "manual" daemon-reload is required, is it safe to do it >> from within a unit? >> > > Usually, calling daemon-reload from a unit is a sign of bad design or > misunderstanding of some tool. What exactly is the problem you are > trying to solve ? > > >> I have a "generator-like" type of unit that changes the configuration of >> other units. However, as it seems, systemd ignores such changes until I use >> daemon-reload... >> > > Yes. you need an explicit daemon-reload here. > why can't it be a real generator ? AFAIK generators are quite low-level and have some restrictions. My unit is kind of high-level (e.g. it needs all filesystems mounted). Actually I started with a "normal" generator, but several restriction I can't remember right now made me change my mind to convert the generator to a "normal" (more or less) unit. > > could you use systemd-run or the equivalent dbus API to do what you are > trying to do ? Good question! ;-) Browsing through the manpage I got the impression that it's systemd's version of "batch" IMHO. I'm unsure whether this has any advantage for my problem. For dbus I must admit that I have no experience of any kind with it... Regards, Ulrich [...] _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel