Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mo, 24.09.18 20:34, Kamil Jońca (kjonca@xxxxx) wrote: >> > This didn't work well enough IIRC, but if it did, then it'd provide almost postfix-like architecture. >> > >> > Or just making 'sendmail' send a SIGALRM to the main daemon would do the job perfectly well, I suspect... >> >> But I still does not know, where is the problem, why exim doest not play >> well with systemd ... > > Here's an educated guess: your script terminates, so that that systemd > decides your service has ended. In such a case it kills any left-over > processes of the service, and this will include the exim process > forked off into the bg, because it is attributed to your script's > context. I made some tests (ie.add sleep at end of exec line), and this confirms your explanation. But ... why this is working as --user service? pure luck? KJ -- http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html Beware the new TTY code! _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel