On Mon, Sep 24, 2018, 22:13 Kamil Jońca <kjonca@xxxxx> wrote:
Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mo, 24.09.18 20:34, Kamil Jońca (kjonca@xxxxx) wrote:
>> > This didn't work well enough IIRC, but if it did, then it'd provide almost postfix-like architecture.
>> >
>> > Or just making 'sendmail' send a SIGALRM to the main daemon would do the job perfectly well, I suspect...
>>
>> But I still does not know, where is the problem, why exim doest not play
>> well with systemd ...
>
> Here's an educated guess: your script terminates, so that that systemd
> decides your service has ended. In such a case it kills any left-over
> processes of the service, and this will include the exim process
> forked off into the bg, because it is attributed to your script's
> context.
I made some tests (ie.add sleep at end of exec line),
and this confirms your explanation.
But ... why this is working as --user service? pure luck?
Maybe the --user manager doesn't have privileges to kill a setuid-root process.
Mantas Mikulėnas
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
