kjonca@xxxxx (Kamil Jońca) writes: > Lennart Poettering <lennart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> On Mo, 24.09.18 20:34, Kamil Jońca (kjonca@xxxxx) wrote: >>> > This didn't work well enough IIRC, but if it did, then it'd provide almost postfix-like architecture. >>> > >>> > Or just making 'sendmail' send a SIGALRM to the main daemon would do the job perfectly well, I suspect... >>> >>> But I still does not know, where is the problem, why exim doest not play >>> well with systemd ... >> >> Here's an educated guess: your script terminates, so that that systemd >> decides your service has ended. In such a case it kills any left-over >> processes of the service, and this will include the exim process >> forked off into the bg, because it is attributed to your script's >> context. > I made some tests (ie.add sleep at end of exec line), > and this confirms your explanation. > But ... why this is working as --user service? pure luck? > > KJ And another question: is it a way to make systemd not to kill background processes? KJ -- http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate. -- John F. Kennedy _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel