On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:35:14PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:32:24PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 12 2024 at 15:18, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:17:03PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> > >> > But I don't think these two commits are necessarily stable material,
> > >> > though I don't have a strong opinion on it. If c163e40af9b2 is
> > >> > backported, then it has it's own large dependency chain on pre 6.10
> > >> > kernels...
> > >>
> > >> It's in the queues for some reason, let me figure out why...
> > >
> > > Ah, it was an AUTOSEL thing, I'll go drop it from all queues except
> > > 6.12.y for now, thanks.
> > >
> > > But, for 6.12.y, we want this fixup too, right?
> >
> > If you have c163e40af9b2 pulled back into 6.12.y, then yes. I don't know
> > why this actually rejects. I just did
> >
> > git-cherry-pick c163e40af9b2
> > git-cherry-pick 51f109e92935
> >
> > on top of v6.12.4 and that just worked fine.
>
> The build breaks :(
To be specific:
kernel/time/timekeeping.c: In function ‘timekeeping_debug_get_ns’:
kernel/time/timekeeping.c:263:17: error: too few arguments to function ‘clocksource_delta’
263 | delta = clocksource_delta(now, last, mask);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from kernel/time/timekeeping.c:30:
