On Thu, Dec 12 2024 at 15:18, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:17:03PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>> > But I don't think these two commits are necessarily stable material,
>> > though I don't have a strong opinion on it. If c163e40af9b2 is
>> > backported, then it has it's own large dependency chain on pre 6.10
>> > kernels...
>>
>> It's in the queues for some reason, let me figure out why...
>
> Ah, it was an AUTOSEL thing, I'll go drop it from all queues except
> 6.12.y for now, thanks.
>
> But, for 6.12.y, we want this fixup too, right?
If you have c163e40af9b2 pulled back into 6.12.y, then yes. I don't know
why this actually rejects. I just did
git-cherry-pick c163e40af9b2
git-cherry-pick 51f109e92935
on top of v6.12.4 and that just worked fine.
Thanks,
tglx
