On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:32:24PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12 2024 at 15:18, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 03:17:03PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > >> > But I don't think these two commits are necessarily stable material, > >> > though I don't have a strong opinion on it. If c163e40af9b2 is > >> > backported, then it has it's own large dependency chain on pre 6.10 > >> > kernels... > >> > >> It's in the queues for some reason, let me figure out why... > > > > Ah, it was an AUTOSEL thing, I'll go drop it from all queues except > > 6.12.y for now, thanks. > > > > But, for 6.12.y, we want this fixup too, right? > > If you have c163e40af9b2 pulled back into 6.12.y, then yes. I don't know > why this actually rejects. I just did > > git-cherry-pick c163e40af9b2 > git-cherry-pick 51f109e92935 > > on top of v6.12.4 and that just worked fine. The build breaks :(
