Hi Greg, Sasha, Thank you for your reply! On 06/09/2024 11:56, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:36:25AM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> Thank you again for your support when we send patches for stable >> versions for MPTCP! >> >> Recently, I sent many patches for the stable versions, and I just wanted >> to check if what I did was OK for you? >> >> I tried to reply to all the 'FAILED: patch' emails you sent, either with >> patches, or with reasons explaining why it is fine not to backport them. >> Are you OK with that? >> >> Or do you prefer only receiving the patches, and not the emails with the >> reasons not to backport some of them? >> >> About the patches, do you prefer to receive one big series per version >> or individual patches sent in reply to the different 'FAILED: patch' >> emails like I did? > > One big series, per kernel tree, would be ideal as that way I don't have > to pick them out and guess as to the order. Sure, I will do that next time, it is even easier for me. I sent the patches in the same order as they are in my working branch, but I understand they could be received in a different order. > Also, if you don't respond to the FAILED emails, that's fine with me, I > don't keep track, but maybe Sasha does as I know he does backports based > on them at times. So I'll let him answer that. Thanks! I will wait for Sasha's reply. > But in the end, whatever is easier for you is good for us, thanks! Thanks! Matt -- Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
