On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:36:25AM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Thank you again for your support when we send patches for stable > versions for MPTCP! > > Recently, I sent many patches for the stable versions, and I just wanted > to check if what I did was OK for you? > > I tried to reply to all the 'FAILED: patch' emails you sent, either with > patches, or with reasons explaining why it is fine not to backport them. > Are you OK with that? > > Or do you prefer only receiving the patches, and not the emails with the > reasons not to backport some of them? > > About the patches, do you prefer to receive one big series per version > or individual patches sent in reply to the different 'FAILED: patch' > emails like I did? One big series, per kernel tree, would be ideal as that way I don't have to pick them out and guess as to the order. Also, if you don't respond to the FAILED emails, that's fine with me, I don't keep track, but maybe Sasha does as I know he does backports based on them at times. So I'll let him answer that. But in the end, whatever is easier for you is good for us, thanks! greg k-h
