Re: It is correct to introduce new sys calls to stable versions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> 2024年8月21日 02:30,Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx> 写道:
> 
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 12:09:41AM +0800, Miao Wang wrote:
>> However, my original question is whether it is expected to include new
>> syscalls in kernel stable tree. According to the document "stable-kernel-
>> rules", if I'm interpreting it correctly, I expect only bug fixes and small
>> driver enhancements from stable releases. I understand the patch in question
>> is actually introducing new syscalls, which is beyond my expectation. So I
>> wonder the consideration of including this patch in stable releases.
> 
> When you maintain stable software you quickly realize that everything
> is not just pure white or black but a shade of gray and that if it can
> be considered as a bug to miss a syscall in certain environments for
> example, then it can become a valid fix to add it. I don't have any
> opinion on this particular one, but since your question is broader I'm
> trying to explain.
> 
> Different people have different expectations about what needs to be
> fixed, that's even why some people will choose a distro over another
> one (prefer to fix only critical bugs over fixing all bugs for example),
> but there's no point restarting a philosophical on this topic which has
> already been rehashed too many times in the past.
> 
> As a rule of thumb, just keep in mind that anything that needs to get
> fix will eventually be fixed.

Many thanks for your explanation!

Cheers,

Miao Wang

> 
> Thanks,
> Willy






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux