Re: [PATCH] block: Fix BLKRRPART regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix BLKRRPART regression
From: "hch@xxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:02:15 +0200
Cc: "hch@xxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxx>, Saranya Muruganandam <saranyamohan@xxxxxxxxxx>, "axboe@xxxxxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@xxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "tj@xxxxxxxxxx" <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, "yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <cbcf7378-e889-489a-92d2-1feb112cff58@nvidia.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 09:10:10AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> which patch is the final one ? Is it this one or the one posted with
> title :-

The correct patch is still the one I sent on Marc 28th and not any
version that reattributes the changes and moves the flag into a totally
weird place.

References:
- Re: [PATCH] block: Fix BLKRRPART regression
  - From: Shinichiro Kawasaki
- [PATCH] block: Fix BLKRRPART regression
  - From: Saranya Muruganandam
- Re: [PATCH] block: Fix BLKRRPART regression
  - From: Shinichiro Kawasaki
- Re: [PATCH] block: Fix BLKRRPART regression
  - From: Chaitanya Kulkarni

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/45] 5.15.156-rc1 review
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: qca: fix invalid device address check
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] block: Fix BLKRRPART regression
Next by thread: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: SVM: Add support for allowing zero SEV ASIDs" failed to apply to 6.8-stable tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux