On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 12:38:03PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/11/24 10:00 AM, John Sperbeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 1:46?AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:17:22AM -0800, John Sperbeck wrote:
> >>> With 5.10LTS (e.g., 5.10.206), on a machine using an NVME device, the
> >>> following tracing commands will trigger a crash due to a NULL pointer
> >>> dereference:
> >>>
> >>> KDIR=/sys/kernel/debug/tracing
> >>> echo 1 > $KDIR/tracing_on
> >>> echo 1 > $KDIR/events/nvme/enable
> >>> echo "Waiting for trace events..."
> >>> cat $KDIR/trace_pipe
> >>>
> >>> The backtrace looks something like this:
> >>>
> >>> Call Trace:
> >>> <IRQ>
> >>> ? __die_body+0x6b/0xb0
> >>> ? __die+0x9e/0xb0
> >>> ? no_context+0x3eb/0x460
> >>> ? ttwu_do_activate+0xf0/0x120
> >>> ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x157/0x200
> >>> ? select_idle_sibling+0x2f/0x410
> >>> ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x13/0x20
> >>> ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2ab/0x360
> >>> ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x180
> >>> ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30
> >>> ? trace_event_raw_event_nvme_complete_rq+0xba/0x170
> >>> ? trace_event_raw_event_nvme_complete_rq+0xa3/0x170
> >>> nvme_complete_rq+0x168/0x170
> >>> nvme_pci_complete_rq+0x16c/0x1f0
> >>> nvme_handle_cqe+0xde/0x190
> >>> nvme_irq+0x78/0x100
> >>> __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x77/0x1e0
> >>> handle_irq_event+0x54/0xb0
> >>> handle_edge_irq+0xdf/0x230
> >>> asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20
> >>> </IRQ>
> >>> common_interrupt+0x9e/0x150
> >>> asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40
> >>>
> >>> It looks to me like these two upstream commits were backported to 5.10:
> >>>
> >>> 679c54f2de67 ("nvme: use command_id instead of req->tag in trace_nvme_complete_rq()")
> >>> e7006de6c238 ("nvme: code command_id with a genctr for use-after-free validation")
> >>>
> >>> But they depend on this upstream commit to initialize the 'cmd' field in
> >>> some cases:
> >>>
> >>> f4b9e6c90c57 ("nvme: use driver pdu command for passthrough")
> >>>
> >>> Does it sound like I'm on the right track? The 5.15LTS and later seems to be okay.
> >>>
> >>
> >> If you apply that commit, does it solve the issue for you?
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> greg k-h
> >
> > The f4b9e6c90c57 ("nvme: use driver pdu command for passthrough")
> > upstream commit doesn't apply cleanly to 5.10LTS. If I adjust it to
> > fit, then the crash no longer occurs for me.
> >
> > A revert of 706960d328f5 ("nvme: use command_id instead of req->tag in
> > trace_nvme_complete_rq()") from 5.10LTS also prevents the crash.
> >
> > My leaning would be for a revert from 5.10LTS, but I think the
> > maintainers would have better insight then me. It's also possible
> > that this isn't serious enough to worry about in general. I don't
> > really know.
>
> Either solution is fine with me, doesn't really matter. I was wondering
> how this ended up in stable, and it looks like it was one of those
> auto-selections... Those seem particularly dangerous the further back
> you go.
Now reverted, thanks. But note, that commit does say it fixes an issue
this far back, which is why it was applied.
greg k-h
