On 1/11/24 10:00 AM, John Sperbeck wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 1:46?AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:17:22AM -0800, John Sperbeck wrote: >>> With 5.10LTS (e.g., 5.10.206), on a machine using an NVME device, the >>> following tracing commands will trigger a crash due to a NULL pointer >>> dereference: >>> >>> KDIR=/sys/kernel/debug/tracing >>> echo 1 > $KDIR/tracing_on >>> echo 1 > $KDIR/events/nvme/enable >>> echo "Waiting for trace events..." >>> cat $KDIR/trace_pipe >>> >>> The backtrace looks something like this: >>> >>> Call Trace: >>> <IRQ> >>> ? __die_body+0x6b/0xb0 >>> ? __die+0x9e/0xb0 >>> ? no_context+0x3eb/0x460 >>> ? ttwu_do_activate+0xf0/0x120 >>> ? __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x157/0x200 >>> ? select_idle_sibling+0x2f/0x410 >>> ? bad_area_nosemaphore+0x13/0x20 >>> ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2ab/0x360 >>> ? exc_page_fault+0x69/0x180 >>> ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 >>> ? trace_event_raw_event_nvme_complete_rq+0xba/0x170 >>> ? trace_event_raw_event_nvme_complete_rq+0xa3/0x170 >>> nvme_complete_rq+0x168/0x170 >>> nvme_pci_complete_rq+0x16c/0x1f0 >>> nvme_handle_cqe+0xde/0x190 >>> nvme_irq+0x78/0x100 >>> __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x77/0x1e0 >>> handle_irq_event+0x54/0xb0 >>> handle_edge_irq+0xdf/0x230 >>> asm_call_irq_on_stack+0xf/0x20 >>> </IRQ> >>> common_interrupt+0x9e/0x150 >>> asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 >>> >>> It looks to me like these two upstream commits were backported to 5.10: >>> >>> 679c54f2de67 ("nvme: use command_id instead of req->tag in trace_nvme_complete_rq()") >>> e7006de6c238 ("nvme: code command_id with a genctr for use-after-free validation") >>> >>> But they depend on this upstream commit to initialize the 'cmd' field in >>> some cases: >>> >>> f4b9e6c90c57 ("nvme: use driver pdu command for passthrough") >>> >>> Does it sound like I'm on the right track? The 5.15LTS and later seems to be okay. >>> >> >> If you apply that commit, does it solve the issue for you? >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h > > The f4b9e6c90c57 ("nvme: use driver pdu command for passthrough") > upstream commit doesn't apply cleanly to 5.10LTS. If I adjust it to > fit, then the crash no longer occurs for me. > > A revert of 706960d328f5 ("nvme: use command_id instead of req->tag in > trace_nvme_complete_rq()") from 5.10LTS also prevents the crash. > > My leaning would be for a revert from 5.10LTS, but I think the > maintainers would have better insight then me. It's also possible > that this isn't serious enough to worry about in general. I don't > really know. Either solution is fine with me, doesn't really matter. I was wondering how this ended up in stable, and it looks like it was one of those auto-selections... Those seem particularly dangerous the further back you go. -- Jens Axboe