Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] qla2xxx: Add support for QFull throttling and Term Exchange" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 3.17-stable tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
Sorry for misplaced tag. This patch is not applicable to stable.

Thanks,
~Saurav



>On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 03:41:00PM +0800, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>wrote:
>> The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 3.17-stable tree.
>>
>> I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
>> Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.
>>
>> I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to
>> <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and let me know why this patch should be
>> applied.  Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
>> seen again.
>
>Sorry for letting that slip through.  I suspect qlogic misplaced the
>tag that should have gone to another patch, and I missed it.


________________________________

This message and any attached documents contain information from the sending company or its parent company(s), subsidiaries, divisions or branch offices that may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]