Re: WTF: patch "[PATCH] qla2xxx: Add support for QFull throttling and Term Exchange" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 3.17-stable tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 03:41:00PM +0800, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 3.17-stable tree.
> 
> I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
> Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.
> 
> I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to 
> <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and let me know why this patch should be
> applied.  Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
> seen again.

Sorry for letting that slip through.  I suspect qlogic misplaced the
tag that should have gone to another patch, and I missed it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]