I have built kernels for 6.0.19 (I don't think anyone confirmed whether or not it worked), plus every 6.1 tag from 6.1-rc1 up to 6.1.7. 6.0.19 worked. No 6.1 kernels worked. For rc1 to rc5 I built with and without the legacy dai renaming patch added in rc6 that I believe would be necessary, but it made no difference either way. On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 9:33 AM Jason Montleon <jmontleo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 6:05 AM Amadeusz Sławiński > <amadeuszx.slawinski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 1/31/2023 4:16 PM, Jason Montleon wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:37 AM Cezary Rojewski > > > <cezary.rojewski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> On 2023-01-30 1:22 PM, Sasa Ostrouska wrote: > > >> > > >>> Dear Czarek, many thanks for the answer and taking care of it. If > > >>> needed something from my side please jest let me know > > >>> and I will try to do it. > > >> > > >> > > >> Hello Sasa, > > >> > > >> Could you provide us with the topology and firmware binary present on > > >> your machine? > > >> > > >> Audio topology is located at /lib/firmware and named: > > >> > > >> 9d71-GOOGLE-EVEMAX-0-tplg.bin > > >> -or- > > >> dfw_sst.bin > > >> > > >> Firmware on the other hand is found in /lib/firmware/intel/. > > >> 'dsp_fw_kbl.bin' will lie there, it shall be a symlink pointing to an > > >> actual AudioDSP firmware binary. > > >> > > > Maybe this is the problem. > > > > > > I think most of us are pulling the topology and firmware from the > > > chromeos recovery images for lack of any other known source, and it > > > looks a little different than this. Those can be downloaded like so: > > > https://gist.github.com/jmontleon/8899cb83138f2653f520fbbcc5b830a0 > > > > > > After placing the topology file you'll see these errors and audio will > > > not work until they're also copied in place. > > > snd_soc_skl 0000:00:1f.3: Direct firmware load for > > > dsp_lib_dsm_core_spt_release.bin failed with error -2 > > > snd_soc_skl 0000:00:1f.3: Direct firmware load for > > > intel/dsp_fw_C75061F3-F2B2-4DCC-8F9F-82ABB4131E66.bin failed with > > > error -2 > > > > > > Once those were in place, up to 6.0.18 audio worked. > > > > > > Is there a better source for the topology file? > > > > > >> The reasoning for these asks is fact that problem stopped reproducing on > > >> our end once we started playing with kernel versions (moved away from > > >> status quo with Fedora). Neither on Lukasz EVE nor on my SKL RVP. > > >> However, we might be using newer configuration files when compared to > > >> equivalent of yours. > > >> > > >> Recent v6.2-rc5 broonie/sound/for-next - no repro > > >> Our internal tree based on Mark's for-next - no repro > > >> 6.1.7 stable [1] - no repro > > >> > > >> Of course we will continue with our attempts. Will notify about the > > >> progress. > > >> > > >> > > >> [1]: > > >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.1.7&id=21e996306a6afaae88295858de0ffb8955173a15 > > >> > > >> > > >> Kind regards, > > >> Czarek > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jason, > > > > as I understand you've tried to do bisect, can you instead try building > > kernels checking out following tags: > > v6.1 v6.1.1 v6.1.2 v6.1.3 v6.1.4 v6.1.5 v6.1.6 > > v6.1.7 v6.1.8 > > and report when it stops working, so it narrows scope of what we look > > at? I assume that kernel builds are done using upstream stable kernel > > (from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/). > > > > Thanks, > > Amadeusz > > > Hi Amadeusz, > Yes, I did the bisects using > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ > > The only thing I did to these was add > 392cc13c5ec72ccd6bbfb1bc2339502cc59dd285, otherwise audio breaks with > the dai not registered error message in dmesg from the rt5514 bug from > 6.0 and up. It wasn't added to 6.1 until rc6, I believe. If there's a > better way to work around the multiple bugs I can try again, otherwise > I will start working on builds from tags and see if I learn anything. > > FWIW, I've seen two people complain that Arch isn't working either > since it moved to 6.1. For the one who was trying, patching out the > commit I came to with the first bisect did not regain them sound like > it did for me. And yet Sasa reports Slackware is mostly working for > him with 6.1.8 on Slackware. I don't know what to make of it, but > thought I'd share in case it helps point someone else to something. > https://github.com/jmontleon/pixelbook-fedora/issues/51#issuecomment-1410222840 > https://github.com/jmontleon/pixelbook-fedora/issues/51#issuecomment-1410673371 > https://github.com/jmontleon/pixelbook-fedora/issues/53#issuecomment-1408699252 > > Probably less relevant since they aren't from upstream and I know they > don't mean as much, but I have tried 6.1.5-6.1.8 Fedora packages for > certain, and went back trying several others from koji back into rc > builds, although using prebuilt kernels, anything before 6.1-rc6 won't > work, as mentioned above. Nothing worked. But as I said I'll build > from tags and see if I can learn anything. > > Thank you, > Jason Montleon > > -- > Jason Montleon | email: jmontleo@xxxxxxxxxx > Red Hat, Inc. | gpg key: 0x069E3022 > Cell: 508-496-0663 | irc: jmontleo / jmontleon -- Jason Montleon | email: jmontleo@xxxxxxxxxx Red Hat, Inc. | gpg key: 0x069E3022 Cell: 508-496-0663 | irc: jmontleo / jmontleon
