On 1/31/2023 4:16 PM, Jason Montleon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:37 AM Cezary Rojewski
<cezary.rojewski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2023-01-30 1:22 PM, Sasa Ostrouska wrote:
Dear Czarek, many thanks for the answer and taking care of it. If
needed something from my side please jest let me know
and I will try to do it.
Hello Sasa,
Could you provide us with the topology and firmware binary present on
your machine?
Audio topology is located at /lib/firmware and named:
9d71-GOOGLE-EVEMAX-0-tplg.bin
-or-
dfw_sst.bin
Firmware on the other hand is found in /lib/firmware/intel/.
'dsp_fw_kbl.bin' will lie there, it shall be a symlink pointing to an
actual AudioDSP firmware binary.
Maybe this is the problem.
I think most of us are pulling the topology and firmware from the
chromeos recovery images for lack of any other known source, and it
looks a little different than this. Those can be downloaded like so:
https://gist.github.com/jmontleon/8899cb83138f2653f520fbbcc5b830a0
After placing the topology file you'll see these errors and audio will
not work until they're also copied in place.
snd_soc_skl 0000:00:1f.3: Direct firmware load for
dsp_lib_dsm_core_spt_release.bin failed with error -2
snd_soc_skl 0000:00:1f.3: Direct firmware load for
intel/dsp_fw_C75061F3-F2B2-4DCC-8F9F-82ABB4131E66.bin failed with
error -2
Once those were in place, up to 6.0.18 audio worked.
Is there a better source for the topology file?
The reasoning for these asks is fact that problem stopped reproducing on
our end once we started playing with kernel versions (moved away from
status quo with Fedora). Neither on Lukasz EVE nor on my SKL RVP.
However, we might be using newer configuration files when compared to
equivalent of yours.
Recent v6.2-rc5 broonie/sound/for-next - no repro
Our internal tree based on Mark's for-next - no repro
6.1.7 stable [1] - no repro
Of course we will continue with our attempts. Will notify about the
progress.
[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=v6.1.7&id=21e996306a6afaae88295858de0ffb8955173a15
Kind regards,
Czarek
Hi Jason,
as I understand you've tried to do bisect, can you instead try building
kernels checking out following tags:
v6.1 v6.1.1 v6.1.2 v6.1.3 v6.1.4 v6.1.5 v6.1.6
v6.1.7 v6.1.8
and report when it stops working, so it narrows scope of what we look
at? I assume that kernel builds are done using upstream stable kernel
(from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/).
Thanks,
Amadeusz
