At Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:45:36 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.29 release. > > There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Tue Sep 30 11:45:24 CEST 2014. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Hi Jiri, > > Build results: > total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0 > > Qemu test results: > total: 21 pass: 21 fail: 0 > > Both obviously look good, however my tree doesn't match your review request. > It includes 245 patches instead of just 142. > > Looks like your tree is a bit ahead of time, so I guess that is ok. > Is there a way for me to avoid this when pulling in your pending changes ? > So far I pull the changes from the stable-3.12-queue branch in your > repository at kernel.org. > > Thanks, > Guenter Plus, this kernel passed my test. - Test Cases: - Build this kernel. - Boot this kernel. - Build the latest mainline kernel with this kernel. - Test Tool: https://github.com/satoru-takeuchi/test-linux-stable - Test Result (kernel .config, ktest config and test log): http://satoru-takeuchi.org/test-linux-stable/results/<version>-<test datetime>.tar.xz - Build Environment: - OS: Debian Jessy x86_64 - CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz x 4 - memory: 8GB - Test Target Environment: - Debian Jessy x86_64 (KVM guest on the Build Environment) - # of vCPU: 2 - memory: 2GB Thanks, Satoru -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html