On 09/27/2014, 11:54 PM, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > At Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:45:36 -0700, > Guenter Roeck wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.29 release. >>> There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>> let me know. >>> >>> Responses should be made by Tue Sep 30 11:45:24 CEST 2014. >>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>> >> >> Hi Jiri, >> >> Build results: >> total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0 >> >> Qemu test results: >> total: 21 pass: 21 fail: 0 > > Plus, this kernel passed my test. On 09/29/2014, 06:52 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions. Hi, and thanks to all of you. >> Both obviously look good, however my tree doesn't match your review request. >> It includes 245 patches instead of just 142. It is because I went wild and already uploaded 3.12.30-rc1 (aka performance release). >> Looks like your tree is a bit ahead of time, so I guess that is ok. >> Is there a way for me to avoid this when pulling in your pending changes ? >> So far I pull the changes from the stable-3.12-queue branch in your >> repository at kernel.org. Yeah, it is fine. You will receive a 30-rc1 message in a minute. (And if you tested the stable-queue already, no need to retest :).) thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html