Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/tsc_msr: Make MSR derived TSC frequency more accurate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:04 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30-01-2020 17:02, David Laight wrote:

> I have no idea. Andy if you can find any docs on the MSR_FSB_FREQ values
> for Merriefield (BYT MID) and Moorefield (CHT MID) that would be great,
> if not I suggest we stick with what we have.

First of all, Merrifield (Silvermont based Atom for phones, FYI: Intel
Edison uses it) and Moorefield (Airmont) have nothing to do with code
names Baytrail and Cherrytrail respectively.
So, please don't confuse people.

I'll try to find some information.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux