On 12/2/2019 9:29 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:27:14AM -0700, Nadolski, Edmund wrote:
I don't have such a controller, but many apparently do. The regression
was reported here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2019-December/028223.html
And of course it's the SMI controller ...
Does 5.4 show the exact error code? Perhaps we should selectively allow
just for that case?
They'll find other ways to f***ck up. Looks like at least the controller
in the bug report also doesn't have an subnqn and the nguid/eui64 are
bogus. I wonder if we actually do users a favour by allowing that..
Agreed, tho since it looks like a regression, does it make sense to treat as a
quirk?
Ed
