On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 09:27:14AM -0700, Nadolski, Edmund wrote: >> I don't have such a controller, but many apparently do. The regression >> was reported here: >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2019-December/028223.html >> >> And of course it's the SMI controller ... > > Does 5.4 show the exact error code? Perhaps we should selectively allow > just for that case? They'll find other ways to f***ck up. Looks like at least the controller in the bug report also doesn't have an subnqn and the nguid/eui64 are bogus. I wonder if we actually do users a favour by allowing that..
