Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.3.8-rc2-96dab43.cki (stable)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:55:24PM -0400, Rachel Sibley wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/29/19 5:21 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:08 PM Rachel Sibley <rasibley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 10/29/19 2:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:57:05AM -0700, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > > > > The test is expected to fail on all kernels without the series.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The series is a bugfix in the sense that vfs is no longer allowed to
> > > > > set timestamps that filesystems have no way of supporting.
> > > > > There have been a couple of fixes after the series also.
> > > > > 
> > > > > We can either disable the test or include the series for stable kernels.
> > > > I don't see adding this series for the stable kernels, it does not make
> > > > sense.
> > I can disable the test from running within the xfs tests if needed.
> > But, how is it done for new tests that rely on features not present on
> > the stable kernels?
> 
> Xiong's version of the test should be able to mask/skip the test based on a
> kernel
> or distro version, but unsure how to mask if missing a specific feature, I'm
> hoping
> Xiong can help answer that.
> https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/tree/master/filesystems/xfs/xfstests

Filed https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/pull/417 to skip it
for now.

Xiong

> > 
> > -Deepa
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux