Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.3.8-rc2-96dab43.cki (stable)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:08 PM Rachel Sibley <rasibley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/29/19 2:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:57:05AM -0700, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> >> The test is expected to fail on all kernels without the series.
> >>
> >> The series is a bugfix in the sense that vfs is no longer allowed to
> >> set timestamps that filesystems have no way of supporting.
> >> There have been a couple of fixes after the series also.
> >>
> >> We can either disable the test or include the series for stable kernels.
> > I don't see adding this series for the stable kernels, it does not make
> > sense.

I can disable the test from running within the xfs tests if needed.
But, how is it done for new tests that rely on features not present on
the stable kernels?

-Deepa



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux