Re: ❌ FAIL: Test report for kernel 5.3.8-rc2-96dab43.cki (stable)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/29/19 5:21 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:08 PM Rachel Sibley <rasibley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


On 10/29/19 2:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:57:05AM -0700, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
The test is expected to fail on all kernels without the series.

The series is a bugfix in the sense that vfs is no longer allowed to
set timestamps that filesystems have no way of supporting.
There have been a couple of fixes after the series also.

We can either disable the test or include the series for stable kernels.
I don't see adding this series for the stable kernels, it does not make
sense.
I can disable the test from running within the xfs tests if needed.
But, how is it done for new tests that rely on features not present on
the stable kernels?

Xiong's version of the test should be able to mask/skip the test based on a kernel or distro version, but unsure how to mask if missing a specific feature, I'm hoping
Xiong can help answer that.
https://github.com/CKI-project/tests-beaker/tree/master/filesystems/xfs/xfstests

-Deepa





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux