On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:52 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:11 PM Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > [This is an automated email]
> > >
> > > This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
> > > The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
> > >
> > > The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.2, v4.19.15, v4.14.93, v4.9.150, v4.4.170, v3.18.132.
> > >
> > > v4.20.2: Build OK!
> > > v4.19.15: Build OK!
> > > v4.14.93: Failed to apply! ...
> > > v4.9.150: Failed to apply! ...
> > > v4.4.170: Failed to apply! ...
> > > v3.18.132: Failed to apply! ...
> > >
> > > How should we proceed with this patch?
> > >
> >
> > Maybe we should ask Geert to drop the v1 patch?
> >
> > I think this should work on every branch --
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/m68k/Makefile b/arch/m68k/Makefile
> > index 0b29dcfef69f..0c736ed58abd 100644
> > --- a/arch/m68k/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/Makefile
> > @@ -59,7 +59,10 @@ cpuflags-$(CONFIG_M5206e) := $(call cc-option,-mcpu=5206e,-m5200)
> > cpuflags-$(CONFIG_M5206) := $(call cc-option,-mcpu=5206,-m5200)
> >
> > KBUILD_AFLAGS += $(cpuflags-y)
> > -KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(cpuflags-y) -pipe
> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(cpuflags-y)
> > +
> > +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -pipe -ffreestanding
> > +
> > ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > # without -fno-strength-reduce the 53c7xx.c driver fails ;-(
> > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-strength-reduce -ffixed-a2
> >
> > Shall I send v2?
>
> That's not needed. I replaced your v1, and pushed it to kernel.org branch
> test-freestanding for the autobuilders.
Thanks, applied and queued for v5.1.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
