On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, Sasha Levin wrote: > Hi, > > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. > The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all > > The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.2, v4.19.15, v4.14.93, v4.9.150, v4.4.170, v3.18.132. > > v4.20.2: Build OK! > v4.19.15: Build OK! > v4.14.93: Failed to apply! ... > v4.9.150: Failed to apply! ... > v4.4.170: Failed to apply! ... > v3.18.132: Failed to apply! ... > > How should we proceed with this patch? > Maybe we should ask Geert to drop the v1 patch? I think this should work on every branch -- diff --git a/arch/m68k/Makefile b/arch/m68k/Makefile index 0b29dcfef69f..0c736ed58abd 100644 --- a/arch/m68k/Makefile +++ b/arch/m68k/Makefile @@ -59,7 +59,10 @@ cpuflags-$(CONFIG_M5206e) := $(call cc-option,-mcpu=5206e,-m5200) cpuflags-$(CONFIG_M5206) := $(call cc-option,-mcpu=5206,-m5200) KBUILD_AFLAGS += $(cpuflags-y) -KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(cpuflags-y) -pipe +KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(cpuflags-y) + +KBUILD_CFLAGS += -pipe -ffreestanding + ifdef CONFIG_MMU # without -fno-strength-reduce the 53c7xx.c driver fails ;-( KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-strength-reduce -ffixed-a2 Shall I send v2? -- > -- > Thanks, > Sasha >
