Re: [GIT PULL] commits for Linux 4.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 30 Apr 10:34 PDT 2018, Nathan Chancellor wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:21:11AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri 27 Apr 00:35 PDT 2018, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 09:05:21AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 09:50:25PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 02:01:20AM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > > Hash: SHA512
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hi Greg,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Pleae pull commits for Linux 4.4 .
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I've sent a review request for all commits over a week ago and all
> > > > > > comments were addressed.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Sasha
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > For what it's worth, commit 87a00850c711 ("pinctrl: msm: Use dynamic
> > > > > GPIO numbering") completely breaks touchscreen input on my Pixel 2 XL.
> > > > 
> > > > That's not good.  Have you reported this to the gpio developers and
> > > > authors of that patch?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > I have not although I've gone ahead and CC'd them on this email.
> > > 
> > 
> > Pixel 2XL is based on the Snapdragon 835, a DeviceTree-only platform; as
> > such any GPIOs would be referenced by the touch driver using
> > gpio-controller and pin offset.
> > 
> > 
> > What kind of touchscreen is this? Is there a driver for it available
> > somewhere to look at?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> 
> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> Here is the touchscreen driver: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-wahoo-4.4-oreo-m2/drivers/input/touchscreen/stm/
> 
> Here are the device tree files: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/android-msm-wahoo-4.4-oreo-m2/arch/arm64/boot/dts/lge/
> 

Thanks for the links. This driver doesn't depend on static gpio
numbering, so there must be some other component causing your issues.

> Do note that Timur stated in a later thread this patch is probably not
> suitable for stable but I'd be happy for a second opinion!
> 

While it doesn't fix any regressions, base should have been -1 when the
driver was originally merged, because one may not depend on the
numbering of gpios.

Regards,
Bjorn



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]