Re: [PATCH v9 07/16] mmc: sdhci-msm: Add get_min_clock() and get_max_clock() callback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



+Greg
-trimmed cc

On 26 April 2017 at 23:44, Andy Gross <andy.gross@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:07:17PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> This add get_min_clock() and get_max_clock() callback
>> for sdhci-msm. sdhci-msm min/max clocks may be different
>> hence implement these callbacks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch needs to be picked up for stable as 4.9 is currently broken w.r.t.
> MMC on Qualcomm platforms.
>
> Fixes: d84be51d1c1d ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable few quirks")
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy Gross

I did a quick investigation around this.

So for some reason Greg decided to pick up the original commit,
a0e3142869d2 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable few quirks"), for 4.9 stable
[1], even if that patch wasn't sent or tagged for stable.
It was a mistake, as simple as that - and I should also have spotted
it when Greg posted his stable-review series, sorry.

For clarification, the original commit a0e3142869d2 ("mmc: sdhci-msm:
Enable few quirks"), is present in 4.10 together with $subject patch.
So the regression is present only in 4.9 stable.

Greg, can you pick up @subject patch for stable according to Andy's
suggestion or you want some of us to re-post it to stable?

Kind regards
Uffe

[1]
https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg167259.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]