On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> +Greg
> -trimmed cc
>
> On 26 April 2017 at 23:44, Andy Gross <andy.gross@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:07:17PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> >> This add get_min_clock() and get_max_clock() callback
> >> for sdhci-msm. sdhci-msm min/max clocks may be different
> >> hence implement these callbacks.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch needs to be picked up for stable as 4.9 is currently broken w.r.t.
> > MMC on Qualcomm platforms.
> >
> > Fixes: d84be51d1c1d ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable few quirks")
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andy Gross
>
> I did a quick investigation around this.
>
> So for some reason Greg decided to pick up the original commit,
> a0e3142869d2 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Enable few quirks"), for 4.9 stable
> [1], even if that patch wasn't sent or tagged for stable.
> It was a mistake, as simple as that - and I should also have spotted
> it when Greg posted his stable-review series, sorry.
>
> For clarification, the original commit a0e3142869d2 ("mmc: sdhci-msm:
> Enable few quirks"), is present in 4.10 together with $subject patch.
> So the regression is present only in 4.9 stable.
>
> Greg, can you pick up @subject patch for stable according to Andy's
> suggestion or you want some of us to re-post it to stable?
Sorry about this. What git commit should I take for this from Linus's
tree for the 4.9-stable tree? Or if there isn't one, I'll be glad to
just revert this.
thanks,
greg k-h