On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 10:58 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 08:49:36AM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 15:08 -0700, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:43:06PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > > > > Greg, could push your mail queue so I can compare with upstream? > > > > > > I don't know what you mean by that, I'm not going to push my stable mbox > > > up publicly, sorry :) > > > > hehe, not your mbox :) You had 5 pending i915 drm patches in your queue you said earlier. > > Please push these to https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/log/ > > especially the 4.4 branch :) > > It seems to me you don't realize that there is a substantial difference > between seeing patches in one's mailbox and applying them to a tree > fixing the conflicts to then be able to add them to a queue. For the > same reason I can say I have a few patches pending for 3.10 but they're > not in a queue yet and will only be once I process them. > I do but I can be a bit too direct and I am a lousy typewriter ... Let me rephrase a bit: Please consider moving those 5 i915 drm patches to the top of the queue as at least one of them fixes a long standing regression which prevents our Broadwell laptop users to move to 4.4 Jocke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html