On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:43:06PM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 10:59 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:41:21AM +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Did you try it or at least the kernel which contains it ? It is important > > > > > > No I haven't. I myself do not have such a laptop so I must find someone that does > > > and willing to test stuff for me(I maintain our Linux DE used for in-house development) > > > All I can say for sure is that 4.1.x works and 4.4.x does not :( > > > > OK that's already a good indication. > > > > (...) > > > > > > Yes I get that but I figured that a upstream commit that is marked: > > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.2+ > > > already was approved for stable and it would find its way into all relevant branches. > > > > Indeed it could be one candidate, so if you can afford to wait for a > > next release to see if it fixes your problem that's the easiest way. > > Otherwise you'll have to bisect either between 4.1 and 4.4 to find > > which one broke, or to test mainline to see if it's fixed again. But > > given that it was a regression, it's likely that someone else will > > notice it and propose a fix (possibly the one above). > > > > Yes, plenty of people have similar has a problem but Intel devs have had hard time > finding the bugs. > > Greg, could push your mail queue so I can compare with upstream? I don't know what you mean by that, I'm not going to push my stable mbox up publicly, sorry :) > Seems like this patch has been lost though: > [PATCH stable-4.4] drm/i915: Update CDCLK_FREQ register on BDW after changing cdclk frequency Not lost, still in my todo queue, along with 663 other patches I need to review/apply... thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html